Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rule 11

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was unvandalised back to a redirect. ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

utter waffle David Humphreys 17:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Nonsense. --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 17:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete bollocks. --djrobgordon 17:17, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• It's unsourced unverifiable rubbish. But deletion is not the solution, and there was no reason to get AFD involved. Just revert to the original redirect to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, where Rule 11, and its role in the debate over tort reform is discussed. Uncle G 17:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.