Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rule Boston Camera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A7, G11, G12 (this is verbatim from several pages including Yelp), WP:SNOW - pick your poison. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rule Boston Camera

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability/Reads as promotional Caffeyw (talk) 05:31, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - basically just an advertisement. Stalwart111 06:06, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, borderline G11. Only fringe coverage online. Dea db eef 06:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:11, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:12, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not only is it borderline G11 but it appears to be a clear CSD A7. I see no assertion of this company's significance. Wikipedia is not a business directory. –Wine Guy~Talk 18:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any evidence that the company meets our notability guidelines. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.