Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Running on the cracks
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Running on the cracks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-sourced personal essay; violates WP:NOT (Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought) mhking (talk) 20:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Reads like a book review. Have attempted to get the author to improve the article (as it was previously CSD:A1ed). Reserving judgement on article to see what the author does to improve it. Hasteur (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That's because it is a book review. It's this book review ganked lock, stock, and barrel from Amazon. As such this is speedily deletable for being a copyright violation. Uncle G (talk) 21:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Concur. Tagged Speedy G12. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 21:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That's because it is a book review. It's this book review ganked lock, stock, and barrel from Amazon. As such this is speedily deletable for being a copyright violation. Uncle G (talk) 21:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.