- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tim Song (talk) 02:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Runway Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not believe that this publication is notable, I believe this Wikipedia article is for advertising purposes. I cannot find significant coverage of it in multiple reliable sources. What I can find is an interview with Nole Marin on a fashion website in January that says that "Runway Magazine is a new publication, and I am their fashion editor. It’s in the infancy stage and hopefully the publication will develop into something of value."[1] His own words suggest that it is not (yet?) notable. Fences&Windows 18:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 18:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—absence of sources. ╟─TreasuryTag►prorogation─╢ 18:17, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Sources in the article are barely sufficient to establish existence, insufficient to establish any notability. This might be salvageable with improved sources if they exist, but in the meantime there are plenty of non-notable glossy fashion magazines out there. — Gavia immer (talk) 18:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Advertisement thinly disguised as an article; also fails WP:GNG. ukexpat (talk) 19:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and replace with a redirect to The Devil Wears Prada, which is almost certainly what any reader will be looking for. Guy (Help!) 20:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article appears to be here only to support a very specious claim that the trademark existed prior to the movie. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG, no reliable sources provided or found in gnews search. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/locked redirect to The Devil Wears Prada. Pretty much lots of puffery for a very non-notable magazine trading on a fictional name to get traction and filled with editors who have not bent to the consensus to redirect in any way at all. Nate • (chatter) 23:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No claim of notability; fails WP:GNG. Johnuniq (talk) 04:39, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.