Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RushHour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RushHour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unreferenced, excluding the quote. A low-quality stub. Seems impossible to find any source. — Sanmosa 15:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Found several sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] Stopped there. Probably not notable, but there are definitely sources. SportingFlyer (talk) 21:07, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @SportingFlyer: Whatever, thanks. I shall put those sources to the Articles for deletion of the same article of Chinese Wikipedia. Maybe we may save an article. — Sanmosa 04:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @SportingFlyer: Sources from thestar.com and The Gateway would be great, but others seems poor. — Sanmosa 12:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:59, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:59, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It doesn't pass WP:NNEWSPAPER, but there are sources. SportingFlyer (talk) 02:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searching by "RushHour Canada"(even without quotes), nothing special comes up. D4iNa4 (talk) 19:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.