- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Punkmorten 13:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:WEB. Article has been db-bio'd and prodded, but the delete tags were summarily removed in both cases (with no explanation). — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 12:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - even the hat offer has expired - Peripitus (Talk) 12:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:WEB Optimale Gu 12:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Horribly formatted, seems to be a fraudulant entry, if not, unencyclopedic and non-notable.--Mincetro 12:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete just not encyclopedic. feydey 13:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 21:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.