- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 07:12, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity bio page for a Nintendo ROM hacker. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 00:04, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- See also: Back to the Future 4, Dalton McGuinty's Kids' Computer Game, Big Kids Pro-Wrestling, World Heroes 3, Sex Pot Racing, Religious Blackjack
- See also: Womanbusters II - Katie's Revenge (added later, but can we still include this one in the combined AFD nomination? It's another game by the same guy and should fall under the same criteria.) --howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 16:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and delete all the pages relating to his game, his is non-notable and so are his hacks dr.alf 00:24, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all of those. Indium 01:10, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity ColumbusCrew29 23:42, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. mdd4696 01:48, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Olorin28 02:55, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:20, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all of them. I don't think that almost anyone who is only identified by a 1337 handle is notable. — JIP | Talk 11:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the lot. He's not even notable within the field of rom hacking, and that's leaving aside the question of whether anyone in the field is encyclopedia material. — Haeleth Talk 13:30, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 16:12, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Preaky 03:15, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleteper nom. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk. 06:03, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:Bio. HGB 11:33, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nomination. --Frekja 11:34, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. -=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 13:20, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete one must decide as a gatekeeper of an unbounding flow into the constraints of our virtual resource what shall be left through the sifters abd what shall be detained. This article is not worthy of publishing and seems rather juvenile in motive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boston2austin (talk • contribs) 02:34, 15 November 2005
- Delete all as nn. *drew 12:23, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.