This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete, not notable. Thue | talk 20:29, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No claim for notability, unverifiable 'vanity' articleAverage Earthman 21:17, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like I malformed the entry, hope this has fixed it. Average Earthman 21:19, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete or perhaps speedy if we don't take "greatest man alive" as a serious claim to notability. — brighterorange (talk) 21:48, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as per A7 claiming that a person is arguably "the greatest man alive" is not a serious claim unless evidence is presented to substantiate the claim. The only evidence that we have is that he went to school. Capitalistroadster 03:35, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete obviously someone's idea of a campy hoax article.---CH (talk) 07:07, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.