This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. IceKarmaॐ 03:52, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Being "the youngest hired geopolitical analyst" does not sound notable to me, and it will become less and less notable as he is growing older. It is also rather difficult to verify. The book mentioned in the article is not (yet) known at the Library of Congress. Austrian 15:58, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "As it turns out, tracking terror is no easy feat. Particularly when you live with your parents." Lots of Google hits to his own Web site. Anyone know the background to the Northeast Intelligence Network? Dlyons493 19:27, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn. As for the Northeast Intelligence Network, after some digging, they appear to be a private organization run by a private detective which sifts through the net and news sources looking for terrorist threats and intelligence. They seem to be highly Islamophobic, and seem to claim that everything bad that has ever happened since 9/11 was caused by Islamic terrorists (blackouts, train derailments, etc.). Although some of their work does seem reasonable. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:10, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of notability, per above. Friday (talk) 02:33, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. I thought about nominating this myself, but instead added a cleanup-tag. Borderline notable for web presence, interview on milnet, etc., given age. Jkelly 04:42, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.