- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Celestianpower háblame 15:17, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This game was apparently created two days ago. That should say it all. Delete. — JIP | Talk 07:52, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable original research --Anetode 08:26, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete beat me to the punch, I was going to list this. Nothing worth keeping there. Karmafist 08:27, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Dottore So 08:28, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nn--Irishpunktom\talk 10:41, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - Just zis Guy, you know? 10:51, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nonsense - Kilo-Lima 12:49, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom chowells 13:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Bjelleklang - talk 13:29, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Well i actually followed the rules and played with a bunch of my buddies and this game is amazing. Why dont you give it a try before you knock it. All great games start out somewhere. This one needs a chance to grow, let it fly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.252.249.65 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Glad to hear it's a fun game. However, Wikipedia is not the place to spread it. If it becomes popular to the extent that there are verifiable references to it out there, then we will gladly give it an article. While it's unknown and unverifiable, it's not an appropriate subject. Haeleth 19:55, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
How can something be more verifiable then by the creators themselves? Everything has to begin somewhere. - Dr. Resnick M.D.
- If something is first published here, it's considered original research, which is not allowed as per WP:NOR. As mentioned above, if the game gets popular enough, and other sources can be cited, then Wikipedia can have an article about it. Bjelleklang - talk 20:14, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with no mercy. --Agamemnon2 20:40, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Stop living in the past Agamemnon, embrace the future. S'FEAR DISK
- Delete it. Delete it hard. -- Captain Disdain 00:01, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- DO NOT DELETE I fully support/advocate this fantastic and innvovative new game.
- Delete. Haeleth and Bjelleklang have got it. Once it becomes widely-known and verifiable, an article will be fine. Until that point in time, to abide by the rules ad guidelines of Wikipedia, it has to go Saberwyn 07:50, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research and promotion of new game. Wikipedia is not the way to spread new ideas, products or games. - Mgm|(talk) 08:06, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete probably created by one of the games inventors. nonnotable and semi-vanity. 70.110.14.98 19:34, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
DO NOT DELETE Stop being sticklers about one rule of credibility and allow innovative ideas to prosper. Do you enjoy electricity? Well it would have never been invented with anti-progressive people as yourselves.
- It's not about being anti-progressive, it's just that if you allow any recently-invented game to have it's own article, wp would be overflowed by them. WP is not an advertising board, if you want to promote the game, set up your own site for that purpose, and create an article when you can cite sources who claim that the game is a success that has caught on by the general public! Bjelleklang - talk 08:41, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.