Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SALTR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SALTR

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN company lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources (?) (enough to build a full article). No suitable merge targets. czar 15:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. czar 15:40, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 15:40, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. czar 15:40, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While this seems to describe both company and product, I found no good results for either. Since I could not find any verifiable sources (WP:Verifiability), barely any reliable ones (WP:Reliable Sources), and got the sense that this did not seem appropriate for an encyclopedia (WP:NOTADIR), I never reached the step of applying the policy for organizational notability WP:CORP (a subjective and questionable exercise in any event).--69.204.153.39 (talk) 19:55, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - you get many hits on this name, but not for this company. A few brief mentions, not enough to show they meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as I haven't looked at this closely but the case seems apparently obvious with this being a new company with unlikely chances of getting enough coverage for improvement. SwisterTwister talk 17:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.