Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAP Enterprise Learning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to SAP AG. Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:31, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SAP Enterprise Learning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (software) -- couldn't find refs where it was discussed as significant, doesn't appear to be used in schools, no obvious third-party manuals, and no historical significance asserted. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Part of the nominator's argument for deletion is that the product does not appear to be used in schools. However, I could not find any evidence that indicates that this product is intended for use in schools. According to SAP's website, this product appears to be intended for use by large businesses to implement a web or virtual classroom for employee training. This is supported by page 95 of Sam's Teach Yourself SAP in 24 Hours. This book also implies that Enterprise Learning is a module of SAP ERP product (I don't have time to read more closely). If so, a merge to the article on that ERP product might be warranted if notability cannot be established. Rilak (talk) 04:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect. Goes to SAP AG. Szzuk (talk) 14:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge - Following up on my earlier comment, it seems that Enterprise Learning is part of SAP ERP, so this article should be merged there for lack of notability. Google Books finds 40 or so results for Enterprise Learning, and as far as I can see, all coverage is either not independent or not significant enough for notability. Rilak (talk) 05:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.