Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAP Enterprise Services Architecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to SAP AG. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 16:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SAP Enterprise Services Architecture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. Has been tagged for notability for six years - hopefully we can resolve it one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 08:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - if notability cannot be established, some of its content should be merged to SAP AG#Enterprise Service-Oriented Architecture which has a section for this topic, and the rest probably moved to Draft space, just in case some of its content is needed in the future. Diego (talk) 18:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - original deleted specified that SAP AG company was not notable, clearly it is. References are provided for article from both SAP AG source and external source Peter Campbell 12:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to SAP AG#Enterprise Service-Oriented Architecture or SAP NetWeaver. The company is certainly notable, but notability is not inherited. One independent reference is not enough to establish this architecture's notability as distinct from other SAP products. A search reveals incidental mentions and how-to articles, but no additional significant RS coverage. Incidental mentions are usually related to SAP NetWeaver, so I suggest that as a merge target.Dialectric (talk) 19:24, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to SAP AG. Stifle (talk) 16:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.