- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SCREEM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 18:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The best I could find is this, which in my view is not enough to justify an article.--Michig (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The software has not been taking off as I believed when I wrote the first article. Nixdorf (talk) 21:11, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This software has been dead for years. — Jeremy 05:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nixdorf's comment is why articles need to be sourced first, then written. Miami33139 (talk) 07:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Playing wise are we? ;-) Nixdorf (talk) 01:03, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.