Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCRIPT (journal)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:40, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SCRIPT (journal)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable magazine with a single published issue Josh Parris 09:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's true we're a new journal just starting out, but we're getting a lot of attention in the asemic art world.24.234.119.93 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Delete, I stand by my original PROD: "Non-notable brand-new journal." Also, attention from Tim Gaze and Michael Jacobson is would not be independent coverage of this journal, as our guidelines look for, because they are both on its editorial board. Glenfarclas (talk) 09:37, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article creation premature. Brand new, no secondary sources, non-notable. --Crusio (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no independent coverage to establish notability. ~ DC (Talk|Edits) 15:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough coverage by reliable third parties to merit inclusion at this time. Might pass notability guidelines in the future, but at this point it's premature. Cocytus [»talk«] 05:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.