- Delete - just another Magic card, easy to look up at [gatherer.wizards.com].
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT to S Corporation. Owen× ☎ 18:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Almost certainly a complete hoax. Google draws a blank --RoySmith 01:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete either as hoax or per WP:CORP. PJM 03:08, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete advert/hoax and redirect to S Corporation. Gazpacho 05:59, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with Redirect to S Corporation --RoySmith 16:58, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Non-notable and the term "scorp" is a recognized legal term for a subchapter s corporation. Jtmichcock 12:56, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If that's true, then why aren't you voting to redirect? - Mgm|(talk) 20:57, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to S Corporation is fine. No deletion required. - Mgm|(talk) 20:57, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to S Corporation Klonimus 01:52, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Motion for speedy closure
editThe logical redirection for this is to S Corporation, a type of corparate organization in which the company'ss income is taxed as personal income of the owners. It is not anticipated that any further voting will be otherwise. Klonimus 01:52, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.