Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEPS Self Defense

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SEPS Self Defense (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non Notable martial art only thing I can find on a google search is this article. Also contains WP:OR and no references BigDunc^Talk 11:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:N, no reliable sources. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:CORP as advertising, as it has no reliable sources. Note, the author shares the same name as the subject of the article. Also, only refers to the company website or subsidiaries.--Finalnight (talk) 15:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - may be notable one day, but for now is by far too young and completely unrecognized. Pundit|utter 01:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn. JJL (talk) 02:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NN advert. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 07:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Blatant advertising and self-promotion. Enigma ^message 03:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.