- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- SLUDGE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to pass WP:Notability. Could not find any reliable sources for WP:Verifiability. Marasmusine (talk) 13:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails to meet the minimum requirements of WP:N. For filtered Google results, see [1] and [2]. — Rankiri (talk) 15:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I added a scientific article mentioning SLUDGE and an interview with the creator, as well as a text input tool for SLUDGE. Some coverage of Out of Order, the game for which SLUDGE was originally developed, I put on the Talk page. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The scientific paper only contains a single fleeting mention of the subject. The Just Adventure+ article is practically a primary source. — Rankiri (talk) 21:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – I'm afraid the sources mentioned aren't enough to establish notability as what Rankiri said above. –MuZemike 00:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.