- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 17:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SNOWsh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN search engine which has not yet launched. Good faith gsearch turns up lots of ads, but not notability. Another editor's prod contested by author without comment. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this search engine. Joe Chill (talk) 22:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as spam or hoax. The site is not a general search engine comparable to anything like Google. It seems to be actually a niche winter travel/holiday search engine. Unreferenced and unverifiable. No Google News coverage. Written by a SPA. I don't know where all the technical detail comes from but it smells like the work of an insider, if it is not a hoax. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable spam. --Bejnar (talk) 13:51, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL (as the site hasn't launched yet) and WP:SPAM. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 23:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unlaunched site with no coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 19:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:CRYSTAL applies. -- Samir 06:33, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.