- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Arguments for keeping the article more explicitly refute the arguments for deletion. MuZemike 20:50, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SPLAT! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deprodded, Non-notable looks like an article written just to give visibility to a specific product with no encyclopedic interest. Was proposed for deletion, but its author removed the request. --Pot (talk) 11:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Splat as a plausible typo judging from the various SPLAT!-titled projects on the dab. Nate • (chatter) 05:13, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reluctant Keep per coverage mentioned on software's website; 3 newsletter/magazine articles. --Cybercobra (talk) 00:45, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep per comments above. I found the site while looking for info on the Longley–Rice model, although the link to Longley-Rice from this article was broken (I fixed it). If notability exists as Cybercobra says, then it should remain. I don't know too much about the subject matter, and I admit it needs a lot of work to make it more encyclopedic and less like an advertisement. -Sme3 (talk) 16:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.