Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPOTLIGHT project
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:44, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SPOTLIGHT project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article focuses solely on an EU-funded research project and lacks independent notability beyond the standard research outputs typically required as part of such funding initiatives. Chiserc (talk) 14:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Medicine. Shellwood (talk) 15:26, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:57, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Agree with nom. If notable enough, such details can be added on the two linked pages in the first sentence. Seems both linked pages in the first sentence don't have anything about this project. Asteramellus (talk) 23:49, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.