Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SRI THENKALAI SRINIVASA PERUMAL KOIL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker^{talk to me} 16:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SRI THENKALAI SRINIVASA PERUMAL KOIL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be especially notable. JoelWhy (talk) 12:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Arguably speedy delete A1 (no context). I'm pretty sure it's a temple in southern India, but the content we have here sure doesn't tell me that. There's not really enough here to even start trying to assert notability, and the spelling problems don't help. I cannot find anything for "Sri Thenkalai Srinivasa Perumal Koil", but since the article misspells Muthialpet as "Muthailpet" (and I'm dubious about "Alarmelmangai Thaiyar" too), I can't even guarantee that I'm searching for the right thing here. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:04, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete anything of note could be just added to the already existing mention at Muthialpet, Pondicherry. MilborneOne (talk) 18:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.