Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STALKER Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

STALKER Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable webmagazine, no reliable third party sources. As it fails currently fails WP:42, and cannot pass that threshold, I believe it should be deleted. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 17:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete there's a small chance that the defunct print version might have been notable, but the website certainly isn't. Without reliable sources though it has to go. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.