- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:39, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- STEALTHbits (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable technology corporation, with very limited sources. Most are self published. Tinton5 (talk) 03:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete: Puff piece. Kerfuffler (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No reliable sources and obviously intended to promote the subject. – MrX 02:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: while individual products might be notable (I didn't check them), the company definitely fails WP:NCORP. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 18:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.