- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- STFIL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete:Item appears to be a wp:neologism. Likely everyone will forget about it after the election, and there's been no reliable coverage of this item. Fraud talk to me 02:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. I have one response for this: WTF? MuZemike (talk) 04:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of widespread usage. - Richard Cavell (talk) 09:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - neoblogism invented all of four days ago. KleenupKrew (talk) 13:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.