- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- STOCK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Couldn't find any RS, hard to use google since that generic name. mabdul 21:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. First4Uppingham (talk) 21:22, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no 3rd party references, no indication of notability for this software, created by an SPA as possible spam/promotional. Dialectric (talk) 11:24, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - since the website is in another language, I presume any reliable sources would be as well. Combined with the name being a common word, it's impossible to tell for sure if reliable sources exist, but they most likely don't. User:King4057 (COI Disclosure on User Page) 07:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.