- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- SVIA HIV model (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research, pure and simple. No evidence of significant independent coverage in the 8 unique GHits, including Wikipedia and mirrors. Nuttah (talk) 19:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, zero Pubmed hits, unpublished original research. Tim Vickers (talk) 18:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedias no original research policy. Armbrust Talk Contribs 07:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR~ Ciar ~ (Talk) 23:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I couldn't find any reliable sources. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.