Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SWAT Environmental

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SWAT Environmental (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don;t see evidence that this company is notable. "Fast growing" a/c Inc. means only :might be notable someday" DGG ( talk ) 17:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete dubious...per nom.Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Leaning towards delete - They have a good cause but I have to say that I've found very little that isn't PR or substantial. I searched several times at Google News until I found this but copying the little snippet in the preview revealed to be a republished press release. It states this was covered by NBC News which I finally found a vimeo link through a local NBC affiliate in Lansing, MI. Very good cause and the Inc. rankings are promising for the future but there really isn't much for a detailed article not to mention two of the current references are PR so the short vimeo link wouldn't help. Absolutely no prejudice towards a future article or userfying. SwisterTwister talk 21:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.