- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus to delete; default to keep. - Philippe 03:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- SWiK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No assertion of notability or evidence of coverage in reliable sources. Per guidelines on the notability of web content, there is no evidence of historical signficance, impact, prominent achievements or major innovation. No awards or independent coverage. Parent company, SourceLabs lacks a wikipage also. WLU (talk) 15:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 15:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable wiki. KleenupKrew (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, has some non-trivial published references: Linux Mag article and O'Reilly Radar. Others exist, but they're mostly of the blogs-on-teh-interwebs-say variety. – PranksterTurtle (talk) 14:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Added reference. I'd almost say it establishes notability, except it's from July, 2005 - nearly 3 years old. It'd be nice to have some evidence it's expanded or done something in the 3 years since LM reviewed :( WLU (talk) 18:36, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because of the reference added by WLU. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 23:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.