Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sa'd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:13, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sa'd

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sa'd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, no modern settlement by this name there today. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete based on the current lack of sourcing and minimal content. However, if sources are provided to confirm that this town exists now or existed in the past, I would reconsider this recommendation. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Useless uncited three-word article of dubious accuracy. Softlavender (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.