Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sable Holiday (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 07:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sable Holiday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

OK, I accept that WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid argument. Applicable guideline would be WP:PORNBIO, and I just can't see how she passes it. Article is unsourced, no sources added since last AfD in Oct 05. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 15:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No sign of notability in the article. Additionally, subject has exactly one video to her name. Tabercil 23:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 00:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Only one video, Google hit count <12k, most googlebait. 9 print appearances, 3 covers but Gent isn't that notable. Still bigger than the others. No claim of notability in article. I'm not seeing how she's even close to satisfying WP:PORNBIO.Horrorshowj 02:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.