- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 19:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sabularse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable family, fails WP:GNG. It might also be original research. This article is a recreation of a previously deleted material via PROD. Declined WP:CSD G4. Bluemask (talk) 15:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. New article from new user who needs advice on sourcing and formatting; better to help the user along rather than repeatedly slamming the article with inappropriate tags. Prod-deleted articles can generally be restored on request, so the previous prod deletion is irrelevant here. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable example of the implementation of Alphabetical Catalog of Surnames.—Ash (talk) 08:28, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable surname. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 05:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.