Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachitanand Singh
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sachitanand Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 07:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 07:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Sam Sailor Talk! 07:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - fails fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN and the article is of a disastrous bad quality. The Banner talk 09:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC) And the original author already removed the AfD and two prods.
- Delete He is the head for his political party in one of the 243 legislative districts of Bihar. I am not seeing any way that this would make him notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - This is an unreferenced biography of a living person and was previously properly tagged for proposed deletion as an unsourced BLP. This tag was improperly removed without adding references. As an unsourced BLP, it certainly doesn't meet either general notability or political notability. The fact that the article is of bad quality isn't in itself reason to delete, but unsourced BLPs should be deleted even if of good quality. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.