Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sack of Azekh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sack of Azekh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sack of Azekh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains WP:OR, the book "The Kurdish National Movement: Its Origins and Development" contradicts this page, stating on page 59:

[Muhammad Pasha] laid siege to Azikh but failed to take it, owing in part to the inhabitants' fierce resistance and in part to disturbing developments at 'Amadiya. He was forced to relinquish his conquests in this region and to hurry back to the rebellious town, where the former ruler Sa'id Pasha, supported by a popular uprising, had deposed Musa Pasha and compelled him to flee. ^[1]

Annwfwn (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC) [reply]

References

1. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=FCbspX-dGPYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=muhammad+pasha+of+rawanduz&ots=RpL4kQVs3I&sig=fLrFGCQRzkuMV-NwCoRQ2JDlJj8#v=onepage&q=ama&f=false

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, and Iraq. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: This is yet another instance from a series of problematic creations by the same editor. While the presence of OR is concerning, it wouldn't be the rationale for deletion. The main problem here is that there is no significant coverage to merit a separate article. This should have been covered by Muhammad Pasha of Rawanduz instead. Aintabli (talk) 16:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I was unable to find any in-depth secondary reliable sources but no prejudice to keeping or merging if any editor is able to find those sources. Aintabli (talk) 16:13, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Lacks reliable sources for notability. A quick google search didnot show specific media coverage.WikiMentor01 (talk) 06:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Support per nom. Kajmer05 (talk) 12:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.