Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was incubate to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Sacred Code. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Code

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:03, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as article fails notability criteria for films. Every film has plot and characters. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 19:33, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFILM and WP:CRYSTAL with no assertion of notability. Johnuniq (talk) 03:58, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correct name: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Userfy as per WP:TOOSOON. My sense is that the delete !votes above might be due to an improper Find sources looking for English language sources for an unreleased Italian film. However, it is learned that under its actual name Sacro Codice this project IS getting coverage in Italian language sources,[1] but as it is still in works, and does not have enough to merit it being an exception to WP:NFF, it might be more welcoming if we return it to its author with our thanks and a suggestion he wait a bit. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it fails to meet any of the basic criteria for inclusion. Also, I have placed a prod tag on Jordan River (director) whose sole claim to notability is this alleged future film and an unsourced claim that he won a directing award at the age of two. I don't throw WP:HOAX around lightly but I'm leaning strongly in that direction. - Dravecky (talk) 23:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree that the article is premature, but as numerous Italian-language sources speak toward the film under its Italian title,[2] use of the word hoax seems inapplicable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:49, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy Per Schmidt. —Mike moral ♪♫ 22:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.