- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Everyone seems to agree this is non-notable. But this proposal to merge one article into two others not about this subject doesn't make sense and can't be implemented. Anyone is free to add new sourced information as appropriate to the other related articles, and I'll make the draft available to anyone if they think it would help. Mangojuicetalk 16:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sacrum Torch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable. Article says this label was created to represent two artists. It should be merged to their page. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, or else merge into Doc Hammer and Lisa Hammer articles. Actually there are a few artists mentioned in the article, but two of them don't even have their own articles and a Google search does little to suggest notability for this record label. If it is kept, the article needs vast improvements, not the least of which is the clarification of its current status. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 22:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah it's pretty confusing. No references. The article actually says the one band with a wikipedia article (besides the hammers who seem to have created the label) is no longer represented by this "label": "When Mors Syphilitica was signed to Projekt Records, Sacrum Torch continued to be credited as the band's manager until it was replaced by Athan Maroulis." Thanks for taking the time to investigate and for your helpful comments.ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 13:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Doc and Lisa Hammer articles. No claims to notability, no evidence of notability. Does not meet inclusion criteria so should be merged into the notable articles. Theseeker4 (talk) 13:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect per above. Since this business exists solely as an adjunct to Doc and Lisa Hammer's musical careers, any questions about it should be answered at their articles. Alas, the most interesting bit of the article, the line about the sacrum being the bone that allowed the resurrection of the dead, is unreferenced. This at least is something I'd like to know more about. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.