Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safe Climate Act

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Safe Climate Act

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article should be deleted. Bills from previous Congresses that never became law don't warrant inclusion on Wikipedia, since there are at least 4000 every year. There was no contention, major endorsements, or even legislative movement on this bill. THOMAS is the appropriate ___location for a permanent record of it, not Wikipedia. Titomuerte (talk) 09:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - While it's true that bills which never became law don't warrant inclusion on WP, this bill seems to have gotten a decent amount of coverage in mainstream media, as evidenced in a google news search. The coverage seems to have significantly waned lately, which is what pushed my !vote to delete, as the notability of this bill appears to be temporary. Also, the external link to the house.gov site appears to be dead. SnottyWong talk 12:10, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This article starts with the words "The Safe Climate Act (HR.1590) is a climate change bill". Surely that means that the article title, unless and until it gets passed, should be "Safe Climate Bill"? I'm more familiar with parliamentary procedures in the UK, but I'm still pretty sure that in the US nothing becomes an act until it has been passed by Congress and had whatever the equivalent term is for the royal assent. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:11, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - while some proposed laws (Bills) could be notable, this is not. 24.97.138.94 (talk) 18:44, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.