Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sage Testini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sage Testini

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography with questionable notability. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did a Google Search on the individual and could not come up with an WP:RS, nor was there much coverage on this person as well. --Dekema2 (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Minor roles in a few films and TV episodes. Even non-WP:RS IMDb doesn't have much to say about him. He wasn't notable by 2006 and, if IMDb is to be believed, hasn't done anything since. Oh, there's his own Internet talk show ("Life on Hiatus with Sage Testini") which, according to his web site [1] is "coming soon". --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 03:09, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. no weight to claim for notability and no reliable sources available online. Canuckle (talk) 06:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:A7. There's no claim of notability made in the article and I can't find any sources that could change this. Tchaliburton (talk) 11:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well done everybody!. This was part of a research assignment I was working on about the effectiveness of crowdsourcing. I will have a blog about this shortly. Cheers. --reggietini (talk) 03:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:POINT and WP:HOAX. Then read them again. And then, for good measure, read them a third time. Then write a blog about what you learned from that. Bearcat (talk) 08:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with fire. Bearcat (talk) 08:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per G3. Creator admits that this article is a hoax. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.