- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seicer | talk | contribs 22:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Salsaghetti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete was tagged speedy delete as spam, but less spammy than just not notable on which basis I say we should delete it. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No assertion of notability. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 23:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This actually is a real candy. Macarion (talk) 05:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Article convinces me that I would like to try the stuff, but it does not convince me that it is even remotely notable. In other words, what we have here is an instance of successful WP:SPAM. Cosmic Latte (talk) 20:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.