- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick 14:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ORG. Only 54 non-wiki ghits. Contested prod. MER-C 02:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete article is funny and organization seems legit and singular. you don't have to delete every article about something just because it's not mentioned in the NYTimes. Jen 03:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete article seems to admit it's own Non-notability. Canadian-Bacon 03:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This article is mostly in-jokes and other inside references, apparently not written for the general public. --Metropolitan90 03:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Edeans 04:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. 0L1 Talk Contribs 23:25 16/12/2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable group fails WP:ORG. Doc Tropics 01:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 06:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence from WP:RS that this group meets WP:ORG. --Kinu t/c 07:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.