Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sami's Power Sequences
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sami's Power Sequences (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
In this revision the author indicates this is original research ("...a proposition by a wiki user..."). Alksub 00:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, otherwise unpublished original research. "Sami Altakla" returns no hits on Google either. Hersfold (t/a/c) 00:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Apparently OR, probably self promotion. - Caribbean~H.Q. 04:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pure original research, article admits (or admitted) as much. Iain99 06:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per hilarious OR :) Giggy\Talk 06:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: OR if I ever saw one. --Goochelaar 11:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR. Maybe the contents should be user-fied – the author clearly has a good imagination, and the patterns are interesting, if not exactly profound. DavidCBryant 19:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Probably original research. Something suspiciously similar to the well-known number 142857 appears for both 2 and 5, and just maybe something worth noticing is here, but Wikipedia is not the proper forum for such novelties. If it's been published anywhere else, then that could be cited here and it would not be "original research" for the purposes of Wikipedia's deletion policies, in which case I might reconsider. Michael Hardy 20:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. OR; non-notable; simple consequence of Euler's theorem. Gandalf61 09:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.