- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ~ mazca talk 12:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Samson Awiah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the new WP:CRIC and also WP:GNG. HawkAussie (talk) 10:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 10:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 10:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 10:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep meet WP:NCRIC and trying to pre-empt a proposal that hasn't happened yet seems a bit disruptive. At worst redirect to the team article. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete the standard article must all meet is GNG. Any article that does not meet GNG should be deleted. It is time to stop Wikipedia being Cricketpedia and to remove the cricketcruft.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 14:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.