- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sand Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band with no significant coverage in reliable sources. A search reveals lots of mentions in Mp3, blogs, and social networking sites, but little else (except for industrial equipment). Astronaut (talk) 20:40, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:12, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 11:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Do not meet WP:BAND, can find no WP:RS, even a search of boston.com reveals only trivial mentions and they are a Boston band. Their albums are released by themselves (i.e. no label). Sorry J04n(talk page) 11:57, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:BAND. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.