Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep gurme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sandeep gurme

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sandeep gurme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References in English mainly only have passing mentions of the person in question. Seems to fail WP:BIO Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 12:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 12:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per G11: phrases like "has done commendable work", "has gained scads of attention and praise for some of his noble work", "has been glorified and admired", "his dynamic leadership", etc. demonstrate that this is wholly promotional. Gurme is also non-notable since there is no significant coverage of him, so the article should be deleted in any event. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - clearly does not meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:28, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Promotional article which lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.