Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandhya Sharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Nepal#Miss Nepal International. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:00, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sandhya Sharma

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear if meets WP:ANYBIO, community consesus would suit this article. Author might want to establish notability? Pulisi (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pulisi (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Pulisi (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm curious to see the outcome of this, if only because recently I came across a similar stub on Supriya Shrestha and was at first tempted to move for deletion, but decided in the end to run with it instead. Whatever the consensus is on this, should presumably then apply to that, as well. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Not enough notability. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:35, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

-How? Could you explain how you reached that conclusion?nirmal (talk) 04:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep ( how strong?? spiritually or emotionally? lol)- the subject easily passes WP:GNG because of WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources (check sources) including national-level media outlets. The coverage is bound to increase soon as she has been decleared as a public figure now. nirmal (talk) 04:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The sources are all about the one event and don't go into any detail about her except to say-- "oh, and there was also this title, which this person won". Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.. and these titles too "...Miss Popular choice, Miss beauty with purpose and Miss beauty with substance awards too". No point of organizing an event if no one is going to participate.. nirmal (talk) 13:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I expected, the coverage is increasing e.g. [1]. It passes WP:GNG. nirmal (talk) 13:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Nirmal, although not much coverage, having won Miss Napal international is notable. Peter303x (talk) 01:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC) [reply]
Delete - Fails WP:BLP1E. Simply winning a beauty pageant alone is not enough to establish notability. 184.99.92.146 (talk) 01:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

-But she is now a WP:PUBLICFIGURE.nirmal (talk) 03:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep as I'm creator of this wikipedia page and she is the winner of Miss International Nepal. Owlf 07:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources are enough for notability and the sources are reliable and independent to subject. Yeti Dai (talk) 07:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Which sources? And which criterion of notability? Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] These sources are enough to meet WP:GNG. Yeti Dai (talk) 05:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Miss Nepal#Miss Nepal International This is BLP1E, as the sources show. The title she won is not enough to presume notability on its own. She has not been shown to meet WP:GNG; it will surely be through additional achievements, not this one event, if she goes on to. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Usedtobecool, with whose analysis I agree. WP:BLP1E applies. Narky Blert (talk) 08:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:46, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as per Usedtobecool's rationale. Not enough to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.