- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. However, another comment or 2 would have been helpful. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Santa Paws (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book series; unsourced for many years. Orange Mike | Talk 00:25, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are sources for anyone who wants to fix the article: [1]. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 01:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - as per,Regent. It's in 500 libraries - that's good enough too.--Kudpung (talk) 08:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.