Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santosh style

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as patent nonsense by GraemeL

"SantoshStyle cannot be taught or explained." If so, it probably doesn't belong in Wikipedia. Joyous | Talk 15:59, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Ifnord 16:43, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as vandalism, or whatever. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:27, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Added Speedy deletion to main page, so now do we delete the RFD? :) Sethie 20:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! We sorta kinda keep it. Santosh, on the other hand, can't be taught or explained and must therefore go away. - Lucky 6.9 20:56, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.