- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can be restored if anyone wants to work on it, but as a poor BLP, it goes for now. Courcelles 00:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sascha Aurora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced and distinctly promotional WP:BLP but may be salvageable. Guy (Help!) 23:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- delete May be salvageable, but as it is now it should be deleted. If articler is wikified and sources get added I may change my opinion. WildHorsesPulled (talk) 23:49, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Yes it seems a bit promotional but there are plenty of references, even if they are not in the preferred format, and there are enough achievements to claim notability. The fact that it is not yet a good article is not enough justification for deletion.filceolaire (talk) 19:23, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:49, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 06:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.