Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Compère

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Technically this could have been closed as a speedy keep right after it was posted as the nominator failed to provide a reason and turned out to be a sock anyway. However, after discounting both the nomination as well as comments with no basis in policy I still see a consensus to delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:11, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sasha Compère

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 February 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Iamzine13: Deletion rationale? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answer @WikiDan61: This article lacks of Citations & Reliability & it does passes or meets General Notability For Person MrZINE 19:55, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is too short, does not contain a photo of the person, and is non-notable. --Ernesztina (talk) 20:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article being short, not containing a photo isn't really a criteria for deletion. Legion X (talk) 19:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clearly passes general notability there are many sources for this person. All the sources are reliable and the article has two references. And to Ernesztina as well as the nominator it is called a stub and therefore does not automatically mean that it should not be on here just because it is "short" or does not have a photo. If the criteria is to have a photo now then we might as well delete 75% of what is on wikipedia. Games of the world (talk) 23:58, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
keep the article I would like to withdraw my nomination for this AFD MrZINE | talk 19:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the actor does not meet WP:NACTOR (though she might in the future). As for WP:GNG, I fail to find anything other than trivial coverage and press releases mentioning her name in cast lists. Of the current sourcing in the article, one source is about her and that is a short notice about her being cast in the TV show, while the other two are again just mentions of her name. --bonadea contributions talk 13:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly fails the multiple significant roles in notable productions test, does not pass any other actor notability criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:30, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 13:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since subject fails WP:NACTOR. -The Gnome (talk) 10:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.