Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satellite Image Comparison
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 11:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Satellite Image Comparison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-encyclopedic. Just a page with 2 images on it. Atmoz (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. Didn't we have this debate somewhere before? William M. Connolley (talk) 00:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-encyclopedic. They took anything back in 2003. Mandsford (talk) 15:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not sure what to make of this article - it doesn't seem to have a subject except "hey look at this, cool huh?" Maybe the author is trying to make some point, but it's probably some kind of original research. Nice references, though. – jaksmata 18:36, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While the article does explain what the 2 images represent, I see no significance in this topic. LoudHowie (talk) 22:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Unencyclopedic. Joe Chill (talk) 22:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not significant and this obviously does not belong in an encyclopedia. ThaLux (talk) 07:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.